I assign blogs in some of my classes, and believe that blogs fill some of the goals of this college's mission of Purpose Centered Education. Blogging invites students to form their own opinions, reflect on their experiences and the material, and craft responses that are then published in a public forum. Recent scholarship shows that blogging promotes active learning and accountability. Ellison and Wu found that students “attend more carefully to online writing opportunities (as opposed to papers submitted to an instructor),” and that they “read these texts [assigned] more carefully when they know their interpretations will be online and therefore accountable to a larger audience.” In their study, Ellison and Wu identify some of the positive outcomes of student-generated, new media enhanced assignments such as blogs and E-portfolios, including: increase student engagement, enhance informational technology skills, harness intrinsic student interest and involvement, promote ubiquitous and asynchronistic learning, provide evidence of student progress and teaching effectiveness.
Scholarship shows that blogs help students become better writers and more invested in their work both inside and outside the classroom. Further, it has been suggested that writing a blog can become a productive, life-long process, one that helps students to develop a voice as they express issues of concern to them in a public forum. Some students who are introduced to blogging in my class continue to do it outside of the classroom setting. One of these student blogs received the attention of the college and eventually local media as he was featured in an ad campaign promoting the college's Purpose-Centered Education model. Blogs, and social media more generally, can lead to "Education that Works," as they invite students to become citizens who actively participate in a democratic society. I have written more fully on this here.
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Sunday, October 13, 2013
CFP: Theatre & Performance Studies Area (Southwest PCA/ACA)
CFP: Theatre & Performance Studies
Abstracts Due November 15, 2013
Abstracts Due November 15, 2013
35th
Annual Southwest PCA/ACA Conference
February
19-21, 2014, Albuquerque, NMhttp://www.southwestpca.or
Hyatt Regency
Panels
are now being formed on topics related to Theatre & Performance Studies in
its various forms and approaches. This Special
Topics Area encourages dialogue between varied fields of performance
scholarship (i.e., performance studies; theatre, dance, and cultural studies;
as well as queer and post-colonial theory), and exploration of critiques of
race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, technology, and nation. Papers across performance modes, cultural
contexts, and historical periods are welcome.
Topics might include but are not
limited to:
- Performativity and
theatricality
- Traditional and
nontraditional modes of performance
- Rituals and the everyday as
performance
- The globalization of culture
- Commodification of culture
and the culture of commodification in local and global contexts
- New technologies and social
media as performance
- Mainstream popular dance and
music: fan culture, pop culture,
etc.
- Explorations of highbrow,
midbrow, and lowbrow culture(s)
- The relationship between
food, the body, and performance
- Performance for and in
protest movements
- Rehabilitation through
theatre and other art forms
- Limits, failures, and the
impossibility of theatre
- Gender Performativity
- Performance of the body, real
and imagined
- Contested boundaries between
performance, theatre and other art forms
- Historical approaches and
theoretical analyses of musical theatre, Broadway, and other mainstream theatrical
forms
- Popular representations of
performance in film, television, and media
- Popular and avant garde
approaches to theatre
Lynn
Sally
Theatre
& Performance Studies Area ChairAssistant Professor, American Urban Studies
lsally@mcny.edu
Please
visit the Southwest PCA/ACA website for complete information about the
organization, areas of study, conference information, exhibitors, affiliated
organizations, and graduate student awards.
Feel free to share this CFP with friends and colleagues engaged in all
aspects of theatre and performance studies.
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Promoting the Democratic Classroom: Students Write their Midterm
In class midterms and finals have never been an assumed
component of my syllabi. I have always questioned
whether tests allow students to demonstrate integrative knowledge and the
ability to apply concepts. Students can
sink their teeth into an experiential fieldtrip or a reflective essay – tests
simply measure a student’s ability to regurgitate information. Furthermore, quantitative assessment of
qualitative methodologies seems at odds, almost an oxymoron.
But this semester I assigned a midterm in a class called
“Everyday Life in Urban Settings,” a class that introduces the students to
qualitative methodologies and asks them to explore, through experiential field
experiences, neighborhoods in the city through the lens of theories about New
York City’s changing urban landscape. In
addition to a midterm, students are also asked to keep a weekly blog where they
post their responses to the readings and fieldtrips. For their final, students are asked to create
a “walking tour” of their neighborhood, or of the “cultural scene” they have
chosen for their Constructive Action class.
The fact is, students take a test more “seriously” than they
do some of the more qualitative methodologies that may better represent course
content. Though the midterm was only
worth 20% of their grade, all the students came to class, on time, with the readings
and notes from the class semester. All
had prepared. All stayed and worked for
the majority of the 2 and ½ hour class. What
made this test “different” was that I asked students to write the midterm (and
post their ideas on a Moodle Forum):
“Imagine you were writing the test for this class. What questions would you include?” I explained to the students that the purpose
of this was two-fold: 1) it would allow them to review the material, and to
identify the most important ideas; and 2) particularly good questions would
become part of the midterm. If they
wrote the question, they would know the answer to the question; furthermore, if
they read each other’s posts, they could prepare answers ahead of time.
Almost all of the students posted questions by the Sunday
deadline even though the class wasn’t until the following Thursday. One wrote in all caps: “PAY ATTENTION CLASSMATES!” as her forum post
title. She introduced her questions with
an excellent reminder: she hoped the
test would be more an “overview”, a best hits of sorts, than a “boring midterm.” Many of her questions, as well as those of
others, ended up on the midterm. The
questions overall showed innovation as well as knowledge of the major concepts
we had covered. Before handing out the
test, I congratulated them on the questions they came up with. They said they really enjoyed the process, and
that all tests should be like this. It
allowed them to study and reflect, to contribute to the assessment tool in real
ways. They were excited to see their
questions on the test, empowering the students and helping put them in charge
of their own learning.
This represents the notion of a “democratic classroom” where
“classroom engagement techniques are designed to help students take personal
responsibility for their learning appreciate the value of participating in the
life of a community, while also developing a sense of self-confidence, empowerment,
and efficacy” (Spiezio in Jacob, Civic
Engagement in Higher Education, 91) Asking
the students to write questions for the midterm provided them “with authentic
opportunities to participate collectively in decision-making processes relating
to the administration of a course, including syllabus construction, assessment
procedures, and the specification of classroom protocols that both students and
faculty are expected to observe (Spiezio, 90).
According to Spiezio, the democratic classroom is a central feature of
the democratic academy. (For more on the
democratic classroom, see Kim Zpiezio, “Engaging General Education” in Barbara
Jacobi’s Civic Engagement in Higher
Education (2009)).
Because students were part of the test-making process, they
had a higher investment in the course material.
They knew what to expect. There
were no major “surprises.” And in my
eyes, students had already passed, as they took the time to review the material
and apply their inductive reasoning skills to identify the main points of the
semester overall. If in class midterms
and tests do make it into my syallbi in the future, so will this democratic
test-writing activity.
The students, overall, did well on the midterm. (Interestingly, the students who posted the most
thorough questions on the Moodle forum also earned the highest grades on the midterm.) When I handed back the midterm, I asked students
to reflect on the process. They said
many things that surprised me. They said
they still had to work and prepare, but that they knew what to expect, and that
this helped alleviate test-taking anxieties.
They helped each other: If one
student posted a question that another did not know the answer to, they could
get the answer ahead of time; in this way, the midterm promoted collaboration
and students as “information sources”. Students
actually enjoyed the midterm (yes,
you read that right!) because they felt they were part of the process. I invite you to try this technique with your
next midterm or quiz, and post your (and your students’) experiences with this process
here.
Labels:
Assessment,
collaboration,
Democratic Classroom
Review of Civic Engagement & Higher Eduation
Jacoby,
Barbara & Associates. Civic Engagement in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass,
2009
This
collection of essays focuses on the increased role that civic engagement takes
in modern colleges/universities. The
authors spend considerable effort proving how new models of education are
necessary to prepare students for the new demands of the 21st century, such as interdisciplinary
approaches, integration between classes, and connection between the real world
and the classroom. Many of these ideas
have been forwarded by Purpose Centered Education for decades.
That
said, it is important to understand and contextualize that advancements being
made in higher education to promote civic engagement are not counter to what is
being done here at MCNY. Instead, this
volume will help place our college’s unique approach to education in the
context of a larger conversation. Lionizing one approach while vilifying
another serves no one; I believe the purpose
should e quite simple: create better classes, empower students to make changes
in their lives and communities, and engage them to become better students and citizens. We are not alone in this mission. We can maintain Purpose Centered Education
while educating ourselves about the
innovative pedagogy occurring across the country.
This
brief overview cuts to some of the highlights of the text. The Introduction (Chapter 1) provides
excellent overview, history of service learning/civic engagement in higher education,
as well as substantial resources. (This chapter can be found online, and the full text is now
available in the MCNY library)
Points
of interest, particularly for our emerging “First Year Experience” program,
include the descriptions of innovative first year programming at colleges in
“Civic Engagement in the First College Year” by Mary Stuart Hunter and Blaire L.
Moody, especially pages 74-78, The “Chapter
on Engaging General Education” provides illuminating descriptions and
applications of the “Democratic Academy” – “premised on a theory of civic
education that can be combined with service-learning and other pedagogies of
engagement to support an evolutionary process of character and education”
(Spiezio, 85) -- which represents quite closely the goals of MCNY’s Purpose
Centered Education. This chapter
includes both practical steps and an empirical case study. In “Educating Students for Personal and Social
Responsibility,” the authors show how three intersecting education reform
movements have laid the groundwork for the exponential growth of programs
geared towards civic engagement: U.S.
diversity, global learning, and civic engagement.
“Educating
Students for Personal and Social Responsibility” provides perhaps the most
compelling evidence that Audrey Cohen’s model of education has in fact become a
major component of higher education in the 21st century, though no
one in the literature credits her for such.
(Do a quick database search on one of the major academic databases for “Purpose
Centered Education” and then “Service Learning.” You’ll see what I mean.) This chapter outlines the work Part of
AAC&U’s 5-year initiative, “Greater Expectations: Goals for Learning as a Nation Goes to
College”, a working group whose task was to identify possible “arc” from
elementary to college of cumulative civic learning. Their findings were published in Purposeful Pathways: Helping Students Achieve Key Learning
Outcomes. The article shows how the
working group developed a “new model of civic learning that could be applied
from elementary school through college and, in the process, establish the habit
of lifelong engagement as an empowered, informed, and socially responsible
citizen” (Musil [in Jacoby], 59). The “six
elements (or “braids”)” of Civic Learning Spiral bear a striking resemblance to
Cohen’s 5 Dimensions: 1) Self; 2) Communication
& cultures; 3) Knowledge; 4) Skills; 5) Values; and 6) Public Action. Though Cohen is not credited in such models,
we can instantly recognize the connection between the six braids and the 5
dimensions in Purpose Centered Education.
Jacoby
is one of the leading scholars on the progress classroom, and her collection
represents the best of the best of educators doing work that would make Audrey
Cohen proud. As we move forward, I think
the greatest tribute we can make to Cohen and her innovative approach to
education is to let it live, and I think part of that life depends on
understanding the many intersections between Purpose Centered Education and
other models of education. I invite you
to peruse the offerings in Civic
Engagement and Higher Education. I
think you will be as blown away as I am.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
CFP: Theatre & Performance Studies
CFP: Theatre & Performance Studies
Abstracts Due December 2, 2012
Abstracts Due December 2, 2012
Conference Theme:
"Celebrating Popular/American Culture(s) in a Global Context”
34th Annual SWTX PCA/ACA Conference
February 13-16, 2013
Albuquerque, NM
http://swtxpca.org
Hyatt Regency Albuquerque
300 Tijeras Avenue NW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
Deadlines
Submission: 12/2/12
Notification: 12/15/12
Early Bird Reg: 12/30/12
Panels are now being formed on topics related to Theatre & Performance Studies in its various forms and approaches. This Special Topics Area encourages dialogue between varied fields of performance scholarship (i.e., performance studies; theatre, dance, and cultural studies; as well as queer and post-colonial theory), and exploration of critiques of race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, technology, and nation. Papers across performance modes, cultural contexts, and historical periods are welcome. Topics might include but are not limited to:
• Performativity and theatricality
• Traditional and nontraditional modes of performance
• Rituals and the everyday as performance
• The globalization of culture
• Commodification of culture and the culture of commodification in local and global contexts
• New technologies and social media as performance
• Mainstream popular dance and music: fan culture, pop culture, etc.
• Explorations of highbrow, midbrow, and lowbrow culture(s)
• The relationship between food, the body, and performance
• Performance for and in protest movements
• Rehabilitation through theatre and other art forms
• Limits, failures, and the impossibility of theatre
• Gender Performativity
• Performance of the body, real and imagined
• Contested boundaries between performance, theatre and other art forms
• Historical approaches and theoretical analyses of musical theatre, Broadway, and other mainstream theatrical forms
• Popular representations of performance in film, television, and media
• Popular and avant garde approaches to theatre
Panels and presentation proposals from graduate students, artists, and independent scholars are welcome, as are non-traditional presentations, roundtables, and performances. SWTX PCA/ACA awards a number of prizes for outstanding graduate student papers; for a list, please go to http://www.swtxpca.org/documents/48.html. Abstracts for single paper proposals should be submitted to the database system at http://conference2013.swtxpca.org (preferred); alternative presentations or panels should be sent by email to the Area Chair, Lynn Sally at lsally@mcny.edu.
Lynn Sally, Assistant Professor
Theatre & Performance Studies Area Chair
Metropolitan College of New York, Department of American Urban Studies
lsally@mcny.edu
Please visit the SWTX PCA website (http://swtxpca.org) for complete information about the organization, areas of study, conference information, exhibitors, affiliated organizations, and graduate student awards. Feel free to share this CFP with friends and colleagues engaged in all aspects of theatre and performance studies.
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Convering Your Old PowerPoints to Prezis
If you are like me, you resisted MySpace as a waste of time. If you are like me, you refused – for years -- to convert over to Facebook even when it had become the dominant social media site for personal and professional use. So when the “newest” technology touts to replace an “old” one, I wait to see if it “sticks” before jumping on the bandwagon. I have changed my tune, thanks to new technologies, like Prezi, which are far superior to their predecessors.
Prezi is a visual spatial way to create dynamic presentations. When a colleague, Adele Weiner, introduced it a few years ago, I instantly could see the advantages of moving away from a linear slide presentation mode. PowerPoint is to Prezi what slides are to digital images, what Friendster is to Facebook… You get the idea.
But what about all those PowerPoint Presentations you labored over? All those transitions perfectly timed, original backgrounds created, hypertext links fixed? You don’t want to redo all that work. Recently-ish (we are talking technology after all), Prezi added a new “import PowerPoint” tool. Here’s a link on how to convert your PowerPoints to Prezis. http://youtu.be/X7PKkYX_458. Yes, there’s still some back work required once the conversion happens, but it’s not as laborious as all that work it took to update your MySpace background with shooting stars.
Prezi is a visual spatial way to create dynamic presentations. When a colleague, Adele Weiner, introduced it a few years ago, I instantly could see the advantages of moving away from a linear slide presentation mode. PowerPoint is to Prezi what slides are to digital images, what Friendster is to Facebook… You get the idea.
But what about all those PowerPoint Presentations you labored over? All those transitions perfectly timed, original backgrounds created, hypertext links fixed? You don’t want to redo all that work. Recently-ish (we are talking technology after all), Prezi added a new “import PowerPoint” tool. Here’s a link on how to convert your PowerPoints to Prezis. http://youtu.be/X7PKkYX_458. Yes, there’s still some back work required once the conversion happens, but it’s not as laborious as all that work it took to update your MySpace background with shooting stars.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Using Social Media for Social Change
At the regional PCA/ACA this week, I presented a paper on my
experiment with using Twitter in a Common Curriculum Course, Critical Thinking
& Writing through Literature, and a BAUS first semester course, Self-Assessment
through Writing and Technology. I presented
my paper, “Writing & Thinking in 140 Characters or Less: Twitter as Purpose-Centered Education,” on a
panel with a Carol Bernard who presented on a study she did using a Facebook
teacher page and Lindsay Illich who presented on using Word Clouds to help teach
composition.
You can create a word cloud out of a text through the website www.wordle.net, and the image that is produced will show you the primary words used in a particular text. This could be an interesting exercise for analyzing the differences between two political speeches, for example, and it made me think that Word Clouds would be a great inclusion in the Public Speaking common curriculum course which is currently being developed at my college. It is exciting to see other educators’ use of technology to enhance the classroom experience, and I was interested in the ways that colleagues have thought so deeply about how to teach students to think and write through these technologies. It also got me to thinking about whether I practice what I preach.
As MCNY promotes Purpose-Centered Education that fosters
students to become socially engaged change agents, this seemed a logical
extension to move towards using Twitter and social media more broadly for
productive ends. Social activism does
not have to happen simply in the traditional “internship” model on which the
college – in the past – has been based.
As a cursory glance at revolutions around the world indicate, social
media has been central to many – if not most – of our modern movements for
change.
This semester, I assigned Twitter for the Critical Thinking Signature Assignment, and asked the students to create a project called “Using Social Media for Social Change.” They were asked to research a topic that was either 1) connected to their Constructive Action or 2) of political or personal interest to them. They were then asked to follow that topic through their involvement with Twitter, by following leaders and organizations, retweeting, and generally getting involved in a topic through social media sight. As they researched, read, and got involved, at the end of the semester they are asked to use social media to sum up their findings, and to recirculate that through a social media sight such as YouTube, Tumblr, Prezi, or a host of other options. The idea is that their research would then be recirculated through the social media that they did their project.
You can create a word cloud out of a text through the website www.wordle.net, and the image that is produced will show you the primary words used in a particular text. This could be an interesting exercise for analyzing the differences between two political speeches, for example, and it made me think that Word Clouds would be a great inclusion in the Public Speaking common curriculum course which is currently being developed at my college. It is exciting to see other educators’ use of technology to enhance the classroom experience, and I was interested in the ways that colleagues have thought so deeply about how to teach students to think and write through these technologies. It also got me to thinking about whether I practice what I preach.
This semester, I assigned Twitter for the Critical Thinking Signature Assignment, and asked the students to create a project called “Using Social Media for Social Change.” They were asked to research a topic that was either 1) connected to their Constructive Action or 2) of political or personal interest to them. They were then asked to follow that topic through their involvement with Twitter, by following leaders and organizations, retweeting, and generally getting involved in a topic through social media sight. As they researched, read, and got involved, at the end of the semester they are asked to use social media to sum up their findings, and to recirculate that through a social media sight such as YouTube, Tumblr, Prezi, or a host of other options. The idea is that their research would then be recirculated through the social media that they did their project.
I realized, perhaps too late, that asking students to bring
about some type of social change – despite the medium – is daunting. It’s not that using Twitter or using Twitter
for productive ends is beyond students, but rather that I don’t know if I succeeded
in breaking that down – just like one would break down a research paper in a
composition class – into steps. Some of
the questions that have arisen include:
how do we get students to use social media critically? What type of additive assignments can be
given to help students establish, research, and develop their topics? In short,
how do we get students to “start a revolution” or movement online?
Here are some ideas of how I will update this assignment in
the future:
1) Suggest Topics. Though it may seem limiting, I realized that
giving students possible topics may be useful for some. “If you could change the world, what would
you change?” question is admittedly both daunting and seemingly impossible. Suggesting topics will give options to those
students who find difficulties coming up with their own. It also allows us to connect to what is
happening politically and socially both locally and globally, and to place our
conversations in class in a larger context.
The topics can give students options, and can help them brainstorm their
own take on the suggested topics.
2) Show
Examples. I tried to model in class how
I was using social media for productive ends by showing students who I was
following, and what I had learned about current events or topics of interest to
me through Twitter. But a don’t know if
this was entirely successful. In
hindsight, I think a list of concrete examples of others using social media for
social change would have helped students understand the concept. These concrete examples could include
a. celebrities
who use Twitter to support causes;
b. individual
or organization who use their Twitter
feeds for activism;
c. examples
of viral videos, etc. that have helped broadast social issues;
d. online
“boycotts” and “buycotts” as strategies for supporting issues important to
students as consumers;
e. examples
of revolutions and movements around the globe broadcast on social media
This list could, in turn, be placed
on a collaborative editing cloud such as Google Docs, so that students and instructors
could contribute examples that they come across.
It may be the end of the semester, but it’s never too late
to think about and implement changes in the classroom. I will run this by students this week in
class, and see what they think. I am
sure they will have suggestions that will improve the classroom for all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)